Division of Fundamental Research

The third side – in the division of the investigations of etymology:

The master (may his blessings last) mentioned that the rules of etiquette are divided into four sections:

1 – The rules that lead to the emotional knowledge of the confirmation of the ruling, which are the searches for requirements such as the correlation between the necessity of a thing and the necessity of its premise, or the prohibition of its opposite.

2 – The rules that require devotional knowledge of the ruling, under which two types fall:

The first: What is to be researched about the smallest argument, such as the indication of the command to be obligatory, the prohibition of prohibition, and the emergence of the specific general in the completion of the rest.

The second: What is to be researched about the major authenticity, such as the authoritativeness of the appearance of the book, fame, or the news of a single person, and so on.

3- The rules that determine the legal practical functions to which the jurist returns after failing to perform the first two categories, such as the legal innocence and the legal precaution.

4- The practical and rational principles that the jurist concludes with after failing to meet the third category

Also, as a rule, “the ugliness of punishment without explanation” and the originality of mental work (1). I say: We envisage the division for two reasons: The first note: It notes the ranks of the process of deduction by saying: The process of deduction has longitudinal hierarchies that do not reach each other with mastery of what preceded it. , And so on. If the professor (may his blessings last) look at this point, as perhaps it is apparent from his words, he replied to him: First: The process of deduction is not in order between the first two sections based on what is well-known and well-known, that the authority of the emirates is not conditional on the blockage of the door of knowledge. Yes, this first problem is not rejected if what is meant is order, not with the observation of what we mentioned from the process of deduction that includes examination, but with the observation of actually reaching some levels, because with reaching emotional knowledge the Nuba does not reach devotional knowledge. And secondly: that if the longitudinal arrangement of the ranks of the process of deduction is noticeable, then the devotional sciences that made a second category must be made of ranks as well. Because some of them depend on others, for example, devotion on the side of significance with the definitiveness of the bond takes precedence over worship with the bond we have and with the master, his blessings continued. And thirdly: that the companionship is in the length of the principalities, and before the principles, so why was it made with it? (1) The Lectures of Sheikh Al-Fayyad, part 1, pp. 6-8, according to the third edition of Dar Al-Hadi in Qom, as well as part 43 of the Encyclopedia of Imam Al-Khoei, pp. 1-4.