Angel of resurrection from assignment in mystical view

The Angel of Resurrection from Recruitment in Mystical Reflection:

There is something left outside the sanctuary of fundamental research, which is: that it is obligatory and desirable, as well as prohibition and disapproval, as they exist in the field of Sharia, so they are found in the field of practical reason, or mental virtues and vices. Which is of good reason, but it is not obligatory, otherwise retribution would not have been true. The interpretation that we have implemented for the separation between obligatory and desirable in the field of Sharia does not come in the field of rational virtues and vices; As there is not here – as long as we are confined to the field of reason – a guardian behind ourselves who asks for something from us, but at the same time he may desire our permissiveness and our freedom, so we must have another explanation for the difference between obligatory and desirable in the field of rational judgments after imposing construction on the building of the realism of Hassan and mental ugliness.

Shall we return to the interpretation according to the degree of difference and say: that the very good, the good is the obligatory, the very ugly and the ugly is the forbidden, and what is between them is average, and the true middle between them is permissible by reason, not considered a virtue or a vice. And in the highest, final stairway from it are the most obligatory virtues, and between them are averages, the ugliness or the goodness of which diminish by the extent of their distance from one of the poles, and the true middle of this ladder is the shelf of the permissible?!

This interpretation contains some paradoxes, such as:

1 – We do not have a specific limit for separating duties from what is recommended. Do you think it is supposed?

The Angel of Resurrection from Recruitment in Mystical Reflection: There is something left outside the sanctuary of fundamental research, which is: that it is obligatory and desirable, as well as prohibition and disapproval, as they exist in the field of Sharia, so they are found in the field of practical reason, or mental virtues and vices. Which is of good reason, but it is not obligatory, otherwise retribution would not have been true. The interpretation that we have implemented for the separation between obligatory and desirable in the field of Sharia does not come in the field of rational virtues and vices; As there is not here - as long as we are confined to the field of reason - a guardian behind ourselves who asks for something from us, but at the same time he may desire our permissiveness and our freedom, so we must have another explanation for the difference between obligatory and desirable in the field of rational judgments after imposing construction on the building of the realism of Hassan and mental ugliness. Shall we return to the interpretation according to the degree of difference and say: that the very good, the good is the obligatory, the very ugly and the ugly is the forbidden, and what is between them is average, and the true middle between them is permissible by reason, not considered a virtue or a vice. And in the highest, final stairway from it are the most obligatory virtues, and between them are averages, the ugliness or the goodness of which diminish by the extent of their distance from one of the poles, and the true middle of this ladder is the shelf of the permissible?! This interpretation contains some paradoxes, such as: 1 - We do not have a specific limit for separating duties from what is recommended. Do you think it is supposed?

The Angel of Resurrection from Recruitment in Mystical Reflection: There is something left outside the sanctuary of fundamental research, which is: that it is obligatory and desirable, as well as prohibition and disapproval, as they exist in the field of Sharia, so they are found in the field of practical reason, or mental virtues and vices. Which is of good reason, but it is not obligatory, otherwise retribution would not have been true. The interpretation that we have implemented for the separation between obligatory and desirable in the field of Sharia does not come in the field of rational virtues and vices; As there is not here - as long as we are confined to the field of reason - a guardian behind ourselves who asks for something from us, but at the same time he may desire our permissiveness and our freedom, so we must have another explanation for the difference between obligatory and desirable in the field of rational judgments after imposing construction on the building of the realism of Hassan and mental ugliness. Shall we return to the interpretation according to the degree of difference and say: that the very good, the good is the obligatory, the very ugly and the ugly is the forbidden, and what is between them is average, and the true middle between them is permissible by reason, not considered a virtue or a vice. And in the highest, final stairway from it are the most obligatory virtues, and between them are averages, the ugliness or the goodness of which diminish by the extent of their distance from one of the poles, and the true middle of this ladder is the shelf of the permissible?! This interpretation contains some paradoxes, such as: 1 - We do not have a specific limit for separating duties from what is recommended. Do you think it is supposed?

The Angel of Resurrection from Recruitment in Mystical Reflection: There is something left outside the sanctuary of fundamental research, which is: that it is obligatory and desirable, as well as prohibition and disapproval, as they exist in the field of Sharia, so they are found in the field of practical reason, or mental virtues and vices. Which is of good reason, but it is not obligatory, otherwise retribution would not have been true. The interpretation that we have implemented for the separation between obligatory and desirable in the field of Sharia does not come in the field of rational virtues and vices; As there is not here - as long as we are confined to the field of reason - a guardian behind ourselves who asks for something from us, but at the same time he may desire our permissiveness and our freedom, so we must have another explanation for the difference between obligatory and desirable in the field of rational judgments after imposing construction on the building of the realism of Hassan and mental ugliness. Shall we return to the interpretation according to the degree of difference and say: that the very good, the good is the obligatory, the very ugly and the ugly is the forbidden, and what is between them is average, and the true middle between them is permissible by reason, not considered a virtue or a vice. And in the highest, final stairway from it are the most obligatory virtues, and between them are averages, the ugliness or the goodness of which diminish by the extent of their distance from one of the poles, and the true middle of this ladder is the shelf of the permissible?! This interpretation contains some paradoxes, such as: 1 - We do not have a specific limit for separating duties from what is recommended. Do you think it is supposed?

The Angel of Resurrection from Recruitment in Mystical Reflection: There is something left outside the sanctuary of fundamental research, which is: that it is obligatory and desirable, as well as prohibition and disapproval, as they exist in the field of Sharia, so they are found in the field of practical reason, or mental virtues and vices. Which is of good reason, but it is not obligatory, otherwise retribution would not have been true. The interpretation that we have implemented for the separation between obligatory and desirable in the field of Sharia does not come in the field of rational virtues and vices; As there is not here - as long as we are confined to the field of reason - a guardian behind ourselves who asks for something from us, but at the same time he may desire our permissiveness and our freedom, so we must have another explanation for the difference between obligatory and desirable in the field of rational judgments after imposing construction on the building of the realism of Hassan and mental ugliness. Shall we return to the interpretation according to the degree of difference and say: that the very good, the good is the obligatory, the very ugly and the ugly is the forbidden, and what is between them is average, and the true middle between them is permissible by reason, not considered a virtue or a vice. And in the highest, final stairway from it are the most obligatory virtues, and between them are averages, the ugliness or the goodness of which diminish by the extent of their distance from one of the poles, and the true middle of this ladder is the shelf of the permissible?! This interpretation contains some paradoxes, such as: 1 - We do not have a specific limit for separating duties from what is recommended. Do you think it is supposed?