Diagnosing the subject of etymology

As for the subject of Principles, the ancients mentioned that it is the four proofs by what they are, or by what they are.

Latecomers discussed both sides. The conclusion of the discussions: that the subject of science should be applicable to the topics of its issues. And both of these two aspects of defining the subject do not have this joke, so you see that the subject of practical principles is doubt, and doubt is not included in the four evidences, and research on requirements such as the study of the corollary between the necessity of a thing and the necessity of its premise is the assignment, and the assignment is not among the corroboration of the four evidences, so all The subject of these researches is not included in the subject of theology according to this definition on both sides. As for the issues of arguments, some of them do not apply to either of the two aspects either, such as the issue of the authority of fame, for fame is not one of the corroboration of the four proofs, and some of them do not apply to the first aspect and the second aspect applies to it, such as the authoritativeness of the appearances of the book, for example. It is necessary to leave this research on the science of origins; Because the evidence and its authoritativeness were taken as a part or a restriction in the subject, so it must be taken for granted in science, and the subject of science is not searched in the same science, even if the subject is the evidence as it is, that would be applicable to this research; Because the phenomena of the book are included in the book. As for the authenticity of a single report, it may be said that it is outside of both aspects. Because the news of a single person is not a book, nor reason, nor consensus, nor Sunnah. Because the Sunnah is the same as the infallible’s saying, action, and approval, not the narration that relates to it, and it may be said: it is outside the first aspect only; Because searching in it is for the evidence of the evidence, but the second aspect applies to it; And that is with the blessing of one of the cares they mention, perhaps the easiest of which is to expand the scope of the Sunnah for the narrative story.

So it turns out: that the science of Usul is based on these two aspects of defining its subject, and many of its researches depart from it. Yes, it may include vocabularies, such as the meaning of the imperative form of the imperative, if it is assumed that the subject of the issue of the signification of the command over the obligation, for example, is the command

In the Book and the Sunnah, the title of the Four Evidences applies to it. And for the sake of these problems, some argue that the science of principles does not have a specific subject, and some argue that its subject is something vague, which we refer to by a general title as a title that applies to the topics of its issues. requirement. The clarification of the absence of these problems is to clarify several things, most of which are mentioned: The first: that the balance in the subject of science is not the extraction of the topics of the issue according to its codification, otherwise it would not apply to high philosophy as well, but the balance is the extraction of the spirit of science according to what was previously explained. The second: that science, although it searches for the symptoms of the subject, but it is not intended that the ratio of the subject to the predicates is the ratio of the subject to the accident, rather what is meant: the presentations with the notes of origin and follow, in the search for light, for example, he talks about its effects and results, even if they are not fixed conditions for the same light. 1). This, too, has become clear from the foregoing. (1) It is not hidden: that the talk about the effects of light and its results is only considered a talk about light and a science whose subject is light when what is noticeable in the hadith is the meaning of the origin of the light for it, and this structure is transposed to the light, the presentations of the show on the place. It is true: that subjectivity is intended to arise, not that the relation of the subject to the predicate is the ratio of the subject to the contingency, but the origin of the assumption that the relation of the subject to the predicate is the relation of the subject to the continuum must be taken for granted, and subjectivity is added to it in the sense of origination, otherwise the four evidences would be a subject of jurisprudence as well. It also imposed a subject of etiquette; Because it is also a source for issues of jurisprudence.