The chosen building is in fact the situation

The chosen building in the reality of the situation:

And achieve the situation in the first place:

There is a formative causation, and a formative law made by the Creator of the universe, who created nature and subjected it to the laws controlling it, which is: that a person according to his nature and the nature that God created him with, whenever he senses something, his feeling of that thing is a reason for his mind to move to the mental image of that thing. The mind refers to the meaning of the lion, for example.

There are two other causalities and two formative secondary laws that govern the first law as a formative government, as if they are extensions of that law:

The first: The feeling of what resembles something is also a reason to visualize the meaning of that thing, so whoever sees the image of the lion drawn on paper, his mind moves to the meaning of the lion, as if the feeling of the image of the lion is a feeling of the soul of the lion.

The second: that the feeling of one thing is associated in the mind with another thing in a special association, which is also a reason for the perception of that other thing, so you see that the one who feels the roar of a lion, for example, has moved his mind to the meaning of the lion, as if the feeling of the lion’s roar is a feeling of the soul of the lion. I mean by feeling the image of a lion or its roar, for example, which includes the transfer of the mind to an image

The lion or its roar, even without an external sense, and by specific pairing, I mean that the pairing has a quantitative specificity, such as the frequent association of the lion’s roar with the lion, or the specificity of how the pairing is in an impressive and striking circumstance, as if a person’s travel to the Hill, for example, is accompanied by a severe illness, so whenever he remembers Traveling to the Hill is a reminder of the disease. Human beings have benefited since the most distant ages in terms of understanding and understanding from these two secondary laws, for example, you see him understand some meanings by finding his image by hand and others, in order to indicate that so-and-so is wearing a turban, tall or short, or otherwise, he points by hand in a way that depicts an image similar to that, so the addressee’s mind moves To the intended meaning, and this is an application of the first law. In order to understand the meaning of the lion roaring like a lion’s roar, the mind moves from this sound similar to the lion’s roar to the lion’s roar in application of the first law, and from the lion’s roar to the meaning of the lion in application of the second law, thus an understanding of the intended meaning is obtained. The mind of the listener moves from his voice to the lion’s roar in application of the first law, and from the lion’s roar to the lion in application of the second law, and from the lion to the brave one for the resemblance between them in application of the first law, thus obtaining the perception of the intended meaning, which is the brave one. And to this point, it was possible to create a language for humans to understand in order to benefit from the two structural laws without any action by humans in the major of the law that there is a subjective causation in something that was not a cause, nor in the smallest of the law that there is similarity or comparison in what is not similar or comparable, And if a sound similar to the lion’s voice was repeatedly found to denote the brave one, for example, the same sound gradually became indicative of the brave without mediating its significance to the lion’s voice, and the signification of the lion’s voice to the lion, and the sign of the lion to the brave, and that

The lion or its roar, even without an external sense, and by specific pairing, I mean that the pairing has a quantitative specificity, such as the frequent association of the lion’s roar with the lion, or the specificity of how the pairing is in an impressive and striking circumstance, as if a person’s travel to the Hill, for example, is accompanied by a severe illness, so whenever he remembers Traveling to the Hill is a reminder of the disease. Human beings have benefited since the most distant ages in terms of understanding and understanding from these two secondary laws, for example, you see him understand some meanings by finding his image by hand and others, in order to indicate that so-and-so is wearing a turban, tall or short, or otherwise, he points by hand in a way that depicts an image similar to that, so the addressee’s mind moves To the intended meaning, and this is an application of the first law. In order to understand the meaning of the lion roaring like a lion’s roar, the mind moves from this sound similar to the lion’s roar to the lion’s roar in application of the first law, and from the lion’s roar to the meaning of the lion in application of the second law, thus an understanding of the intended meaning is obtained. The mind of the listener moves from his voice to the lion’s roar in application of the first law, and from the lion’s roar to the lion in application of the second law, and from the lion to the brave one for the resemblance between them in application of the first law, thus obtaining the perception of the intended meaning, which is the brave one. And to this point, it was possible to create a language for humans to understand in order to benefit from the two structural laws without any action by humans in the major of the law that there is a subjective causation in something that was not a cause, nor in the smallest of the law that there is similarity or comparison in what is not similar or comparable, And if a sound similar to the lion’s voice was repeatedly found to denote the brave one, for example, the same sound gradually became indicative of the brave without mediating its significance to the lion’s voice, and the signification of the lion’s voice to the lion, and the sign of the lion to the brave, and that

The lion or its roar, even without an external sense, and by specific pairing, I mean that the pairing has a quantitative specificity, such as the frequent association of the lion’s roar with the lion, or the specificity of how the pairing is in an impressive and striking circumstance, as if a person’s travel to the Hill, for example, is accompanied by a severe illness, so whenever he remembers Traveling to the Hill is a reminder of the disease. Human beings have benefited since the most distant ages in terms of understanding and understanding from these two secondary laws, for example, you see him understand some meanings by finding his image by hand and others, in order to indicate that so-and-so is wearing a turban, tall or short, or otherwise, he points by hand in a way that depicts an image similar to that, so the addressee’s mind moves To the intended meaning, and this is an application of the first law. In order to understand the meaning of the lion roaring like a lion’s roar, the mind moves from this sound similar to the lion’s roar to the lion’s roar in application of the first law, and from the lion’s roar to the meaning of the lion in application of the second law, thus an understanding of the intended meaning is obtained. The mind of the listener moves from his voice to the lion’s roar in application of the first law, and from the lion’s roar to the lion in application of the second law, and from the lion to the brave one for the resemblance between them in application of the first law, thus obtaining the perception of the intended meaning, which is the brave one. And to this point, it was possible to create a language for humans to understand in order to benefit from the two structural laws without any action by humans in the major of the law that there is a subjective causation in something that was not a cause, nor in the smallest of the law that there is similarity or comparison in what is not similar or comparable, And if a sound similar to the lion’s voice was repeatedly found to denote the brave one, for example, the same sound gradually became indicative of the brave without mediating its significance to the lion’s voice, and the signification of the lion’s voice to the lion, and the sign of the lion to the brave, and that

The lion or its roar, even without an external sense, and by specific pairing, I mean that the pairing has a quantitative specificity, such as the frequent association of the lion’s roar with the lion, or the specificity of how the pairing is in an impressive and striking circumstance, as if a person’s travel to the Hill, for example, is accompanied by a severe illness, so whenever he remembers Traveling to the Hill is a reminder of the disease. Human beings have benefited since the most distant ages in terms of understanding and understanding from these two secondary laws, for example, you see him understand some meanings by finding his image by hand and others, in order to indicate that so-and-so is wearing a turban, tall or short, or otherwise, he points by hand in a way that depicts an image similar to that, so the addressee’s mind moves To the intended meaning, and this is an application of the first law. In order to understand the meaning of the lion roaring like a lion’s roar, the mind moves from this sound similar to the lion’s roar to the lion’s roar in application of the first law, and from the lion’s roar to the meaning of the lion in application of the second law, thus an understanding of the intended meaning is obtained. The mind of the listener moves from his voice to the lion’s roar in application of the first law, and from the lion’s roar to the lion in application of the second law, and from the lion to the brave one for the resemblance between them in application of the first law, thus obtaining the perception of the intended meaning, which is the brave one. And to this point, it was possible to create a language for humans to understand in order to benefit from the two structural laws without any action by humans in the major of the law that there is a subjective causation in something that was not a cause, nor in the smallest of the law that there is similarity or comparison in what is not similar or comparable, And if a sound similar to the lion’s voice was repeatedly found to denote the brave one, for example, the same sound gradually became indicative of the brave without mediating its significance to the lion’s voice, and the signification of the lion’s voice to the lion, and the sign of the lion to the brave, and that

The lion or its roar, even without an external sense, and by specific pairing, I mean that the pairing has a quantitative specificity, such as the frequent association of the lion’s roar with the lion, or the specificity of how the pairing is in an impressive and striking circumstance, as if a person’s travel to the Hill, for example, is accompanied by a severe illness, so whenever he remembers Traveling to the Hill is a reminder of the disease. Human beings have benefited since the most distant ages in terms of understanding and understanding from these two secondary laws, for example, you see him understand some meanings by finding his image by hand and others, in order to indicate that so-and-so is wearing a turban, tall or short, or otherwise, he points by hand in a way that depicts an image similar to that, so the addressee’s mind moves To the intended meaning, and this is an application of the first law. In order to understand the meaning of the lion roaring like a lion’s roar, the mind moves from this sound similar to the lion’s roar to the lion’s roar in application of the first law, and from the lion’s roar to the meaning of the lion in application of the second law, thus an understanding of the intended meaning is obtained. The mind of the listener moves from his voice to the lion’s roar in application of the first law, and from the lion’s roar to the lion in application of the second law, and from the lion to the brave one for the resemblance between them in application of the first law, thus obtaining the perception of the intended meaning, which is the brave one. And to this point, it was possible to create a language for humans to understand in order to benefit from the two structural laws without any action by humans in the major of the law that there is a subjective causation in something that was not a cause, nor in the smallest of the law that there is similarity or comparison in what is not similar or comparable, And if a sound similar to the lion’s voice was repeatedly found to denote the brave one, for example, the same sound gradually became indicative of the brave without mediating its significance to the lion’s voice, and the signification of the lion’s voice to the lion, and the sign of the lion to the brave, and that

The lion or its roar, even without an external sense, and by specific pairing, I mean that the pairing has a quantitative specificity, such as the frequent association of the lion’s roar with the lion, or the specificity of how the pairing is in an impressive and striking circumstance, as if a person’s travel to the Hill, for example, is accompanied by a severe illness, so whenever he remembers Traveling to the Hill is a reminder of the disease. Human beings have benefited since the most distant ages in terms of understanding and understanding from these two secondary laws, for example, you see him understand some meanings by finding his image by hand and others, in order to indicate that so-and-so is wearing a turban, tall or short, or otherwise, he points by hand in a way that depicts an image similar to that, so the addressee’s mind moves To the intended meaning, and this is an application of the first law. In order to understand the meaning of the lion roaring like a lion’s roar, the mind moves from this sound similar to the lion’s roar to the lion’s roar in application of the first law, and from the lion’s roar to the meaning of the lion in application of the second law, thus an understanding of the intended meaning is obtained. The mind of the listener moves from his voice to the lion’s roar in application of the first law, and from the lion’s roar to the lion in application of the second law, and from the lion to the brave one for the resemblance between them in application of the first law, thus obtaining the perception of the intended meaning, which is the brave one. And to this point, it was possible to create a language for humans to understand in order to benefit from the two structural laws without any action by humans in the major of the law that there is a subjective causation in something that was not a cause, nor in the smallest of the law that there is similarity or comparison in what is not similar or comparable, And if a sound similar to the lion’s voice was repeatedly found to denote the brave one, for example, the same sound gradually became indicative of the brave without mediating its significance to the lion’s voice, and the signification of the lion’s voice to the lion, and the sign of the lion to the brave, and that